You're Probably Getting Screwed
Which Presidential Candidate is Better for the Economy, according to non-partisan experts...
Welcome to You’re Probably Getting Screwed, a weekly newsletter and video series from J.D. Scholten and Justin Stofferahn about the Second Gilded Age and the ways economic concentration is putting politics and profits over working people.
Who do the experts and economists say would be better for the economy, Vice President Kamala Harris or former President Donald Trump?
First up, the Goldman Sachs report, which said “The US Economy would be better under Harris.” One of their main reasons is that the hit from the Trump proposal from his tariffs and immigration policy would outweigh the positive fiscal impulse.
Second, according to the Penn Wharton Budget Model, which provides a nonpartisan analysis of federal policies, the Harris economic plan is better for the bottom 95% of Americans. Here’s Professor Kent Smetters talking about the analysis.
And finally, the nonpartisan Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget compared the two economic proposals to see their impact on the national debt and they concluded that Trump’s proposal would add twice as much to the growing national debt.
So do your research. It clearly shows that the Trump economic proposals will increase inflation, add costs to the middle class and blow up the deficit.
Economically, we should probably give Kamala a try.
YOU’RE PROBABLY (ALSO) GETTING SCREWED BY:
The Second Gilded Age
There is a reason we reference a “Second Gilded Age” in the description of this newsletter.
Climate Change
As Hurricane Milton pounds Florida - just over a week after Hurricane Helene ripped through the southern US - it is another reminder of the devastating costs of climate change.
Price Gouging
Billionaires
Fortune 500 Companies
Meatpackers
Private Equity
A new report finds yet another way private equity is screwing us.
Stadium Subsidies
Surprise surprise, yet another study is out that finds stadium subsidies are not worth it. Two extreme examples of the debt taxpayers incur: “More than $100 million in bonds remained when Giants Stadium was demolished in 2010 and Chicago owes more today on Soldier Field renovation bonds than it did when the project occurred in 2002.”
PBMs
UnitedHealthcare
Some Good News
Chair Lina Khan
USDA Competition Announcements
BEFORE YOU GO
Before you go, I need two things from you: 1) if you like something, please share it on social media or the next time you have coffee with a friend. 2) Ideas, if you have any ideas for future newsletter content please comment below. Thank you.
Standing Tall for All,
J.D. Scholten